In their separate judgements on the sensitive 60-year old title dispute on Ramjanambhoomi-Babri Masjid structure, Justices S U Khan and Sudhir Agarwal said that the area under the central dome of the three-domed structure where Lord Ram's idol exists belongs to Hindus.
The majority in the three-judge Lucknow bench also ruled that status quo should be maintained at the disputed place for three months.
Justices Khan and Agarwal decreed that the 2.7 acre land comprising the disputed site should be divided three equal parts and be given to Sunni Waqf Board, and the party representing 'Ram Lala Virajman' (Ram deity).
However, the third judge Justice D V Sharma ruled that that the disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram and that the disputed building constructed by Mughal emperor Babur was built against the tenets of Islam and did not have the character of the mosque.
Justice Khan said "all the three sets of parties, i.e. Muslims, Hindus and Nirmohi Akhara are declared joint title holders of the property/premises in dispute as described by letters A B C D E F in the map Plan-I prepared by Shri Shiv Shankar Lal, Pleader/Commissioner appointed by court in Suit No. 1 to the extent of 1/3rd share each for using and managing the same for worshipping. A preliminary decree to this effect is passed."
However, the judge observed that it is further declared that the portion below the central dome where at present the idol is kept in makeshift temple will be allotted to Hindus in final decree.
He also said that Nirmohi Akhara will be allotted share including that part which is shown by the words 'Ram Chabutra' and 'Sita Rasoi' in the said map.
Justice Khan said even though all the three parties are declared to have one-third share each, "however, if while allotting exact portions, some minor adjustments in the share is to be made, then the same will be made and the adversely-affected party may be compensated by some portion of the adjoining land which has been acquired by the central government."
Sunni Wakf Board said it will move the Supreme Court against the Allahabad High Court order dividing the disputed land in Ayodhya among three parties and said they were not going to surrender it
We will appeal against the division of disputed land among three parties," Board lawyer Zafaryab Jilani told reporters here.
"HC's formula of one-third land is not acceptable to the Waqf Board and it will appeal against it in the apex court," he said.
He said they were not going to surrender the land. However, he said, the Sunni Board is open to any negotiated settlement on the issue if such a proposal for negotiations for a settlement came to it.
Congress welcomed the Ayodhya judgement saying everyone should accept it and no one should treat it as a victory or defeat.
"Congress has held that the controversy should either be solved through talks or the verdict of the court should be accepted. The court has given the verdict. We should all welcome the judgement," party general secretary Janardhan Dwivedi told reporters.
The Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) said the judicial ruling was a green signal to build a grand in Ayodhya and asked all Indians to forget the past bitterness.
RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat told reporters here that judgment of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court "clears the way for a Ram temple" in Ayodhya.
He also appealed for peace in the country and urged people not to celebrate the verdict in a manner that could hurt the sentiments of any community.
VHP welcomed the Allahabad High Court verdict on the Ayodhya title issue saying the faith of Hindus has been endorsed by the judiciary.